Questions about example sentences with, and the definition and usage of "Steal"

look is most likely referring to a style or type of fashion so when someone starts wearing a hat (or changes appearance in some other way) to imitate you this sentence would apply.

"You stole the words right out of my mouth" means they wholeheartedly agree with what you just said. It doesn't have to mean that they were about to say the same thing, but it can mean that. In this context, "you really sound like an American" might actually be referring to what you said earlier or your views/opinions. It can imply that you are similar to an American in that regard. You: Wow, eating hotdogs at a baseball stadium is the best! Person 1: You stole the words right out of my mouth. Person 2: Haha, you really sounds like an American!

It literally means, "steal breath". The cat will take your breath from you. It's superstition, it doesn't really make sense.

example: That dog is neither white nor black. You are neither a bird nor a cat. In is case the "Nor" is saying that she did not feel she had lost a potential husband to her sister. This is actually an older use of the word I think and is not commonly seen much anymore.

It is usually used to say that someone took the attention away from them. Some examples are: Rachel and I were singing and she stood in front of me and stole my thunder. I was doing so well in the game but someone came and stole my thunder.

Stole - took without permission. Seek - looking for. He stole a watch. He will seek revenge. He broke into her house and stole her television. She went to the shops seeking a new television. You posted this question as you seek clarity about the difference between stole and seek.

Stealing is basically taking something you don't own and is someone else's property. Liberating is providing freedom to someone or something, eg - the brave knight liberated the slaves from the kings rule. Providing freedom in oppression, is liberating.

Both of these sentences are a little off. I would say "I wouldn't leave your car unlocked, it might be stolen" meaning there is a chance it could be ... And "I wouldn't leave your car unlocked, it might have been stolen" meaning it didn't happen (get stolen) but it could have, there was a chance. So might rather than must.

Have stolen implies that you have stolen or taken something that doesn't belong to you. You are the one doing the act of stealing. I have stolen the money off of the table. Have been stolen refers to something being taken from you or someone else. You could also say has been stolen. My purse has been stolen. The keys have been stolen.

Security tag

My bag was stolen. < My bag was stolen by a thief.

Spelling is "steel"! It would be called a "flask".

The meaning is not clear. The girl befriended the lady, but the lady stole her money. (Maybe that is what you mean?) ("Allied" is used for military, business, and similar situations. Sometimes for personal matters but that's not so common.)

You can say this: I've lost my phone before at a baseball exhibition. I was concentrating on the exhibition when someone stole it. I tried to use my friend's phone to call it, but it was turned off, so I was never able to get it back.

گلف كلوبسش را دزدي كردند

Basically, these sentences are telling us what happened in the past but presenting it to us as if we were still at that point in time - except with knowledge of what happens afterwards. "1. He was to find out years later that the car he bought was stolen." In this sentence, 'was to' means 'was going to' or 'would'. In other words, 'he would find out years later that the car he bought was stolen' or 'he was going to find out years later that the car he bought was stolen'. It is similar with example 3 that you gave - you can replace 'was to' with either 'would' or 'was going to' and get the same meaning: 'It would take 48 hours...' or 'It was going to take 48 hours...' "2. We were to stay with Vince in Lisbon many times before he moved to Madrid." In this case 'were to' indicates an arrangement that has been decided on. Since we know that Vince moved to Madrid afterwards and that the subject of the sentence ('we') knows about staying with him in Lisbon 'many times', we can assume that this sentence is said after the events outlined have taken place. Therefore you could replace 'were to' with 'were going to' or 'would' like the other two examples, but with 'were' instead of 'was': 'We were going to stay...' or 'We would stay...' Many stories that are written in the past tense use this approach - they give the impression that we are in the same point in the timeline as the events but since the events are actually in the past, writers are able to include hints of what happens later on. Sometimes, narrative-style history books or articles are also written like this, for example you might see something like, 'Shakespeare was a playwright and actor born in Stratford-upon-Avon. He was to write some of the most famous English plays of all time.' Here, 'was to' outlines what was going to happen but this has already happened - at the time of Shakespeare's birth, nobody knew he would become famous for his plays but in the present day, many people know who Shakespeare is. This was a much longer explanation than I had expected, but I hope this helps! Edit: It might help to contrast 'was/were + infinitive' with 'am/is + infinitive'. For example: 'I am to go to London for a business trip.' Here, we know that the plan for the person is to go to London for a business trip, but we don't know anything about what will happen afterwards because it is not something that has already happened. In the same way, 'She is to visit a friend in New York as a surprise.' tells us a plan for the future but nothing about what happens afterwards. If this event has already happened and we know something about an event that followed, you could say something like 'She was to visit a friend in New York as a surprise, only to find that her friend had moved to San Francisco.'

If you don't continue your singing career, you'll be robbing your fans of their enjoyment/performances they enjoy.

yes. it's slang. "he stole watches and fenced them on the street." according to Wikipedia: A fence (noun) is an individual who knowingly buys stolen property for later resale, sometimes in a legitimate market. The fence thus acts as a middleman between thieves and the eventual buyers of stolen goods who may not be aware that the goods are stolen. As a verb, the word describes the behaviour of the thief in the transaction: "The burglar fenced the stolen radio." This sense of the term came from thieves' slang, first attested c. 1700, from the notion of such transactions taking place under defence of secrecy. ------------- so i guess fence (noun) is slang short for deFENCE of secercy. a fence (noun) doesn't ask questions about where you got something or how you got it. either he wants to make a deal or not. in my experience, this use of the word is rare. the places i've heard was almost always in detective dramas and some scenes involving people talking about the sale of stolen goods.

The last two are said the same way

Your grammar is perfect.

take (another person's property) without permission and without intending to return it.