Question
28 Nov 2018

Closed question
Question about English (US)

** On the notions of a reading and that of a lecturer about hydraulic fracking **
There are two opposite views regarding hydraulic fracking. Generally, lecturer opposes the fracking idea whereas the reading defends this.
Reading states that the more the production the less the energy price. More over,it believes that fracking increases job opportunities which leads to the more prosperity. On the other hand, Lecturer notes that this technology is not accepted economically. She argues that while it increases the amount of gas production, it also increases home price, because a lot of workers with their family will migrate to around the operation zone. Because of increasing population, Related states would then have to spend more for police and schools.
Regarding with safety issues, reading believes that additives which are used in hydraulic fracking are environmentally friendly. These additives neither cause water contamination nor radioactive pollution. On the other hand, lecturer believes that these materials do cause ground water pollution, because they contain cancer causing elements like methane and radium. Lecturer adds that water evaporation also causes air contamination which leads to respiratory illness.
Finally, reading mentions that hydraulic fracking is the future of energy industry. But the lecturer says that the amount of gas reservoirs in United States are over-estimated. They are the first energy resource because the government gives them the most attention. If it invests in gas resources and renewable resources equally, then solar and wind energy would compete with the former of the two.
does this sound natural?

Answers
Read more comments

Persian

Persian

Persian

Persian

Persian
Similar questions