Question
27 Dec 2019
- Japanese
-
English (US)
Question about English (US)
Original: Never before in recorded times had a whole culture been transferred bodily to another and previously unknown continent.
A: Never 〈before in recorded times〉had a whole culture been transferred bodily to another and previously unknown continent.
Or
B: Never before〈in recorded times〉had a whole culture been transferred bodily to another and previously unknown continent.
Which do you think A or B is grammatically plausible interpretation??
Original: Never before in recorded times had a whole culture been transferred bodily to another and previously unknown continent.
A: Never 〈before in recorded times〉had a whole culture been transferred bodily to another and previously unknown continent.
Or
B: Never before〈in recorded times〉had a whole culture been transferred bodily to another and previously unknown continent.
Which do you think A or B is grammatically plausible interpretation??
A: Never 〈before in recorded times〉had a whole culture been transferred bodily to another and previously unknown continent.
Or
B: Never before〈in recorded times〉had a whole culture been transferred bodily to another and previously unknown continent.
Which do you think A or B is grammatically plausible interpretation??
Answers
Read more comments
- English (US)
- Traditional Chinese (Hong Kong)
I would say either is fine, "before" just adds to "never". But never mind that, I think the sentence itself is awkward.
If I understand the meaning correctly, I think you want to say something like
"Never before in recorded history had there been a culture that was wholly moved/relocated(?) from one place to (another,) a previously unknown continent."
You can reword that to suit your meaning ^.^
1
like
0
disagrees
Highly-rated answerer

[News] Hey you! The one learning a language!
Want to make the best of your time with your language lessons❓
If there was something you didn't have time to ask your teacher during a lesson, try asking a native speaker on HiNative! You're likely to have a better lesson next time!🗣✨
If there was something you didn't have time to ask your teacher during a lesson, try asking a native speaker on HiNative! You're likely to have a better lesson next time!🗣✨
Sign up
Similar questions
- I don't understand "For the third times in less than a year". This means around 3 years?
- "Two times in a row OR in arrow" ? does this sound natural?
- How many times have that happened to you?
Newest Questions
- right now=rnのように、日常的に略して書く言葉を教えてください。
- It is beginning day of my English daily today. Does this sound natural??
- Is there any case to put "the" before "another"?
- I’ve been learning English with diligence to some extent, but at times, I feel like I’ve been sta...
- Is this natural in American English? To save you more time and energy, you should travel with as...
Topic Questions
- It is beginning day of my English daily today. Does this sound natural??
- 1. Driving being drunk is prohibited by law in the country. 2. Driving listening to music is pro...
- Is this natural in American English? "How many are in your family?" "There're five: my parents, ...
- what is the difference sound between must and most?
- What words could go with "outrageous"?? - The number of the people (?) is outrageous. - This is ...
Recommended Questions