Question
4 March
- English (US)
- English (UK)
-
Korean
-
Simplified Chinese (China)
-
English (US)
Question about English (US)
How do you say this in English (US)? which sentence is correct and WHY( explain too) { question is about articles}
1. A white and a black cow were grazing.
2. The white and the black cow were grazing.
How do you say this in English (US)? which sentence is correct and WHY( explain too) { question is about articles}
1. A white and a black cow were grazing.
2. The white and the black cow were grazing.
1. A white and a black cow were grazing.
2. The white and the black cow were grazing.
Answers
Read more comments
- English (US)
2 is right.
The 2nd describes the object (That being the cows) that you are describing the colors of. Also if you are saying there are two cows and not one, make sure to add the S at the end so it shows you're talking about 2 separate cows
"The white and black cows were grazing"
- English (US)
- English (UK)
@peachteas question is about articles...if a should be used or the
- English (US)
A is talking about a single object, You would need to add the object you are describing
"A black and white cow was grazing"
or
if you're describing more than one you can use The
"The white and black cows were grazing "
- English (US)
- English (UK)
@peachteas well question is - 15(sentence on right side is correct and on left is incorrect)
I thought it should be 'the' not 'a' because in this sentence they are specifically saying about 'black cow' and 'white cow' and when we specifically talk about a noun we use 'the'.
I thought it should be 'the' not 'a' because in this sentence they are specifically saying about 'black cow' and 'white cow' and when we specifically talk about a noun we use 'the'.

- English (US)
They can both be right depending on whether you are being specific or not
When you use “a”, it could mean any cow that you see
When you use “the”, it means specific cows
Highly-rated answerer
- English (UK)
- English (US)
The reason why the left sentence in 14 is wrong is because there's only one article and a plural verb form. You can't refer to more than one item with "a", so "a black and white cow" can only ever refer to a single cow that is both black and white*. The sentence is wrong because "were" is used for plural subjects, not singular subjects. "a black and a white cow" means that there are two cows (each "a" indicates a different cow) and so you have a plural subject, so "were" is fine. The same goes for "the" with a singular noun ("cow") , so it's unrelated to the form of the article.
A black and white cow was grazing ✅
A black and a white cow were grazing ✅
A black and white cow were grazing ❌*
The black and white cow was grazing ✅
The black and the white cow were grazing ✅
The black and white cow were grazing ✅
The black and white cows were grazing ✅
A black and white cows were grazing ❌
*Edit: tiffachu brings up a good point that to some people, the sentence "a black and white cow were grazing" is natural and fine. I guess this is just one of those things that some speakers allow and others don't.
I don't like this sentence and your textbook recommends you against it for the reasons I've outlined above, but it isn't true that you can NEVER omit articles in complex subjects, so I made a mistake in saying that.
Highly-rated answerer
- English (UK)
- English (US)
@tiffachu there are sentences where you can omit the second article but this isn't one of them, or at least it isn't to me and it clearly isn't to the person who wrote the textbook. "A black and white cow are/were grazing" sounds bad to me in all contexts, it doesn't matter what the tense is. It may sound okay to you, which is fine, but to me it sounds incorrect and I need an article in front of the second noun.
I oversimplified my answer to ignore the situations where you can omit the following articles, which is my fault and I shouldn't have done that. You're correct that it is OFTEN more natural to omit following articles in a complex subject, but my point still stands that it is unnatural to do so HERE. Again, if you see nothing wrong with "a black and white cow are grazing", that's perfectly fine and I'm not going to tell you that you're wrong, people can find different things acceptable and unacceptable, but to me and to answer the question that this person had about what's written in their textbook, the reason why "a black and white cow are grazing" is incorrect is because the second article has been omitted.
Highly-rated answerer
- English (US)
Question 14 and 15 are bad examples to teach the use of “a” because it could mean two things:
1. Describing one cow that has two colours (black and white)
Or
2. Describing two cows (one black one white)
In question 14, they meant to describe one cow that was black and white so the verb would be “was” OR you could add an “a” to make it plural
However, it’s natural to omit the second “a” for the second subject so seeing that sentence have “were grazing”, one could assume that they were talking about two cows since the verb is plural
Highly-rated answerer
- English (US)
@askingsaint yeah, sorry i misunderstood the question cause I didn’t think of it saying that one cow was both black and white, didn’t notice till after a while
Highly-rated answerer
- English (US)
Depends on if you were talking about one cow that is black and white or one cow that is black and one cow that is white.
Assuming you were talking about two cows, one that is white and one that is black, #1 is correct. #2 is incorrect because “cow” does not agree with “were”.
If you changed #2 to “cows”, it would be technically correct, but the meaning is different than #1.
#1 means any cows, but #2 is talking about two specific cows that you already know of.
- English (US)
tiffachu's first answer is correct for the original question: both sentences could be correct, depending on whether you are talking about any two cows, or two specific cows.
askingsaint's first answer is correct for the example (14) in the book.
They are slightly different issues.
In informal conversation, we tend to omit some words -- articles and prepositions that most people would know should be there -- but in "correct" writing, if you are talking about two cows, the second "a" has to be there.

[News] Hey you! The one learning a language!
Isn't it a pain going back and forth between various sites to find out the meaning of something❓
With HiNative, you can easily ask native speakers questions for free! Ask native speakers any questions you might have✨
With HiNative, you can easily ask native speakers questions for free! Ask native speakers any questions you might have✨
Sign up
Similar questions
- Could you correct following sentences more matural? - Let's answer questions about your native...
- In these two sentences, which of them is correct? That is what English rules usually does. ...
- What's meaning of this sentence? --- Puppies were so tired they didn't even make it out of be...
Newest Questions
- How do you say this in English (US)? 彼は暗い性格です。
- How do you say this in English (US)? かかりつけの病院はありますか?
- How do you say this in English (US)? 판다+사춘기 = 판춘기를 아래와 같이 "pan"berty 이렇게 써도 괜찮을까요?
- How do you say this in English (US)? わたしは幸せとは自分のまわりにあるものに気づき、感謝することだと思います。毎日幸せです。
- How do you say this in English (US)? 自分磨き
Topic Questions
- How do you say this in English (US)? 판다+사춘기 = 판춘기를 아래와 같이 "pan"berty 이렇게 써도 괜찮을까요?
- How do you say this in English (US)? Já que você não aceita ligações, vou te mandar mensagem
- How do you say this in English (US)? 慣れないことやるもんじゃないな
- How do you say this in English (US)? I have struggling to maintain a constant weight. --constan...
- How do you say this in English (US)? あなたの大好物であるケーキを一緒に食べに行く事が出来る
Recommended Questions