Question
24 Dec 2017
- English (US)
Question about Korean
Please correct this.
to be something = 이다
받침+이야/vowel+야
받침+이에요/vowel+예요
받침+입니다/vowel+입니다
to not be something = 아니다
받침 or vowel + 아니야
받침 or vowel + 아니에요
받침 or vowel + 아닙니다????
no = 아니
아니
아뇨, 아니오, 아니요
아닙니다??????
yes =
응, 어??
네, 예
Please correct this.
to be something = 이다
받침+이야/vowel+야
받침+이에요/vowel+예요
받침+입니다/vowel+입니다
to not be something = 아니다
받침 or vowel + 아니야
받침 or vowel + 아니에요
받침 or vowel + 아닙니다????
no = 아니
아니
아뇨, 아니오, 아니요
아닙니다??????
yes =
응, 어??
네, 예
to be something = 이다
받침+이야/vowel+야
받침+이에요/vowel+예요
받침+입니다/vowel+입니다
to not be something = 아니다
받침 or vowel + 아니야
받침 or vowel + 아니에요
받침 or vowel + 아닙니다????
no = 아니
아니
아뇨, 아니오, 아니요
아닙니다??????
yes =
응, 어??
네, 예
Answers
Read more comments
- Korean
I would like to say about 아뇨, 아니오, 아니요
아뇨 is compressed form of 아니요, so I can say 아뇨=아니요.
아니오 is something can be confused. 아니오 is not the same with 아니요.
It is an old style word which means 'not' while 아니요 means 'no'.
ex)
나는 홍길동이 아니오 : I am not Hong Gildong.
This(above) should be 나는 홍길동이 아닙니다 in modern style.
So you don't need to use 아니오 in daily conversations.
아뇨 is compressed form of 아니요, so I can say 아뇨=아니요.
아니오 is something can be confused. 아니오 is not the same with 아니요.
It is an old style word which means 'not' while 아니요 means 'no'.
ex)
나는 홍길동이 아니오 : I am not Hong Gildong.
This(above) should be 나는 홍길동이 아닙니다 in modern style.
So you don't need to use 아니오 in daily conversations.
1
like
0
disagrees
Highly-rated answerer
- English (US)
@bakbaksa
I thought 아니오 meant "no" and wasn't a version of "아니다".
what about the formal version of "no".
아니->아니요(polite)->아니????(formal form)
I thought 아니오 meant "no" and wasn't a version of "아니다".
what about the formal version of "no".
아니->아니요(polite)->아니????(formal form)
- Korean
@Alanbp
아니요 is formal, and 아닙니다 can be used formally as both 'not' and 'no'
아니요 is formal, and 아닙니다 can be used formally as both 'not' and 'no'
Highly-rated answerer
- English (US)
I believe technically 아니요 is informal (비격식체) but polite. Specifically I believe the speech level is 해요체.
Thanks for confirming 아닙니다 is the formal "격식체" version for both "no" and "to not be" I believe it's specifically the 합쇼체 version.
So I guess you just determine if 아닙니다 = "no" or "to not be" based on context.
Thanks for confirming 아닙니다 is the formal "격식체" version for both "no" and "to not be" I believe it's specifically the 합쇼체 version.
So I guess you just determine if 아닙니다 = "no" or "to not be" based on context.
Newest Questions
- What does “to be borne out shrieking by the villain of the piece”mean here?, can you re-write the...
- I heard a new phone is going to come out from Samsung sooner or later. I heard a new phone is co...
- "Dad, make her stop" Are native speakers use this phrase??
- “I’m not good at acronyms.” Does this make sense?
- I'm a high school student. I want to know what do you think about airports in Japan. If you hav...
Topic Questions
- What does “to be borne out shrieking by the villain of the piece”mean here?, can you re-write the...
- what's grinding
- "The police have issued an appeal for witnesses."(Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary) Does th...
- I have some questions about dating vocabulary. There are some things I can't figure out because t...
- Which is correct grammer, "A is further bigger than B" or "A is further big than B"? Ive never se...
Recommended Questions
