Question
Updated on
8 Mar 2018

  • Simplified Chinese (China)
  • English (US)
  • Japanese
Question about English (US)

The clash erupted in public on Tuesday after the United States government, citing national security concerns, called for a full investigation into a hostile bid to buy the American chip stalwart Qualcomm.

why is "citing" but not "was citing"? and why is "called" but not "was calling" in the above sentence?

Answers
Share this question
Read more comments

  • English (US)

  • Simplified Chinese (China)

  • English (US)

  • English (US)

  • Simplified Chinese (China)

  • Simplified Chinese (China)

  • English (US)

  • English (US)

  • English (US)

  • Simplified Chinese (China)

  • English (US)

  • Simplified Chinese (China)

  • English (US)

  • Simplified Chinese (China)

  • English (US)
[News] Hey you! The one learning a language!

Share this question
The clash erupted in public on Tuesday after the United States government, citing national security concerns, called for a full investigation into a hostile bid to buy the American chip stalwart Qualcomm.

why is "citing" but not "was citing"? and why is "called" but not "was calling" in the above sentence?
Recommended Questions
Topic Questions
Newest Questions
Previous question/ Next question

Ask native speakers questions for free