Q: grammar [have + ~ed] とはどういう意味ですか?
A: That is a perfect tenses.
for example:
I have read the book. It's mindblowing.

I have watched the movie for a few times but never get enough of it.
Q: there as grammar とはどういう意味ですか?
A: There is used for a place
Examples: can you meet me over there.

Look over there
Q: what's this grammar structure " percentage of UK adults TO HAVE USED the Internet " ? why is here to have used? とはどういう意味ですか?
A: Good question! I agree!

Even my native brain hated that grammar out of context. Yes it's correct here as a title of a graph, but I too would much prefer 'who have used ..'

It comes up more in other contexts.

He was one of the first men to have reached the North Pole.
Brazil's Pelé is the only player to have won three World Cup winners' medals.

In meaning it's identical to who have used the internet.
Q: Your grammar is on point とはどういう意味ですか?
A: That means that your grammar is good, perfect!
Q: Improper grammar is their biggest beef. とはどういう意味ですか?
A: beef is another term for an issue or annoyance. It can also be used to say two people dislike each other.


Q: Your grammar is so-so を使った例文を教えて下さい。
A: He's still learning English, so his grammar is so-so.
My sister's grammar is so-so, she just started taking English classes.
Q: is this grammar correct? "if i could do, i would have done it long ago?" を使った例文を教えて下さい。
A: - in response to a question “why not do it?” , your answer is grammatically correct without the ‘do’. Therefore: “if I could, I would have...”

- in response to something like “ let’s go! Do it!” , your answer would need ‘it’ after ‘do’. Therefore: “if I could do it, I would have done it long ago.”

Extra Examples:
#1 : “cmon, just jump”
Response: “ if I could jump, I would have done it.”

#2: “why aren’t you coming to France with us?”
Response: “ I can’t go. if I could go, I would have done it long ago.”

I hope this helps.
Q: "formal grammar" and "formal expressions" in conversation. を使った例文を教えて下さい。
A: In English, talking formally is more about being polite. for example instead of saying,
"Come over here John" you can say
"John, could you please come here?".

Try not to be too direct or sound too confident. You can use words like
"Pardon" or "Excuse me?" Instead of "What did you say" or "What?" If you want to ask for permission you can use "May I..."
"May I look at those documents?" Even though these are polite ways of saying things, it still sounds stiff. I wouldn't worry about it that much, but it also depends on what workplace you are gonna work at. If the work is like construction (for example), you don't really need to be that formal but if it's business you probably do.
Q: (grammar) "complement" を使った例文を教えて下さい。
A: complement is used when two things work well together, unlike compliment = 칭찬

"her shoes complement her outfit"
(her shoes make her outfit better)

"this wine complements the food"
(this wine makes the food better)
Q: had had (grammar) を使った例文を教えて下さい。
A: He had had enough to eat, so he stopped.

She had had her report earlier, but now she couldn't find it.

He had had the car looked at, but it still wouldn't run properly.


Q: grammar school と comprehensive school はどう違いますか?
A: A Grammar School is a school that takes children based on ability, usually by a set of examinations sat at the age of around eleven. There are very few of these left in the UK. A comprehensive school is a school which takes children of all abilities.
Q: Has it got grammar difference? と Does have it grammar difference? はどう違いますか?
A: Better would be: "Is there a grammar difference?" or "Is there a difference in the grammar?"

But "does it have _a_ grammar difference?" and "has it got _a_ grammar difference?" mean the same. "Does it have" is more accepted. Some people don't like sentences with "has it got."
Q: grammar mistakes と grammatical mistakes はどう違いますか?
A: They mean the refer to the same thing, but "grammatical mistakes" is correct because "grammatical" is the adjective form of the noun grammar, and to describe a "mistake", you need an adjective.

"Grammar mistakes" just combines two nouns in an incorrect way.
Q: Descriptive grammar と Prescriptive grammar はどう違いますか?
A: A prescriptive grammar is a set of rules about language based on how people think language should be used. In a prescriptive grammar there is right and wrong language. It can be compared with a descriptive grammar, which is a set of rules based on how language is actually used.

prescriptive grammar is when a person thinks they are using grammar correctly but they are not

descriptive grammar is correct grammar
Q: in grammar と grammatically はどう違いますか?
A: grammar is the rule for how something is said.. grammatically is the description of how something is said

ex : "this sentence is GRAMMATICALLY correct."
ex 2 : "when writing, you need to follow the rules of GRAMMAR."


Q: its just my grammar, is this correct?

"we tasted death, several times in a row."
thanks a lot は 英語 (アメリカ) で何と言いますか?
A: If you wanted a dramatic pause, It's correct.
If you wanted a normal sentence, block out the comma.
correct sentence: We tasted death serveral times in a row
Q: ‎Is this grammar correct?

To ask a question in Hinative is more fun to search at google. は 英語 (アメリカ) で何と言いますか?
A: Interacting via HiNative is much more fun than using google for the same.
Q: Some Korean grammar teacher says that “I am” means “I exist.” Is this true? は 英語 (アメリカ) で何と言いますか?
A: It can mean that.

It can be be a way of agreeing.

For example:

Question: Are you going to the picnic?
Answer: I am.
Q: --> is my grammar correct? I have too much time in my hands
A: I have too much time on my hands.

It should be “on” instead of “in”.
Q: grammar は 英語 (アメリカ) で何と言いますか?
A: QAの全文をご確認ください


Q: I am faced with a challenging English grammar question.

He must have missed the train; he ( ) have arrived by now.
(1) ought to have (2) can (3) will (4)need

The correct answer is (1).

But when I express an surmising meaning of "Probably he has arrived by now", I want to say, "he can have arrived by now" or "he will have arrived by now".

And when I express a meaning of "It is necessary that he should be here by now", I want to say, "he need have arrived by now" or "he will have arrived by now".

Why are the three sentences above incorrect?

A: The same as 着いたはずです

He should have arrived by now

He ought to have arrived by now

He would have arrived by now
Q: Can you correct grammar mistakes?
A: Hello, we are going to be talking about Coffee(maybe add some more details about the overall content). The presentation will be divided into five main topics. the first is about the history of coffee. the second is about the name, the third about cultivation, the fourth about types of coffee and finally about the good and bad effects of coffee. (you could use positive and negative in place of good and bad if you wish to)

Coffee was first discovered in the 6th century and used by Yemen's Sufi Monasteries. Then, from the 6th to the 9th century, coffee was spread to Egypt due to the migration of the Sufis. Europeans were first introduced to coffee in the 17th and 18th centuries. A few centuries later, coffee shops were opened all over Europe/World (depending on what locations you are referring to in this sentence)

Initially coffee was known as Quhwah in Arabic. Then the Turkish came to call it Kahve, after which the Dutch called it Koffie and finally in 1582 the English called it coffee.

I hope this helps you :)
Q: where can I learn English grammar, and how many are they?
A: I think you can get them originally in ur natieve language once ur improved u can practice them on Cambridge English website
Q: is grammar important to learning English?
A: Yes it is. Because without grammer, your sentences wont make sense.
Q: With only grammar, we can't communicate with effectively.
A: Yes, it sounds great! 👍