Q: take precedent とはどういう意味ですか?
A: Precedent = an event that has already happened and is used as an example to deal with similar situations
Q: precedent とはどういう意味ですか?
A: something that has happened before

For example, in law, imagine a judge gave a chimpanzee the same rights as a human.

That would set a legal precedent.

It would mean that it would be easier to give another animal human rights because it wouldn't be the first time it had happened.

If there is no precedent for something then it has never happened before. It is unprecedented.
Q: Given the precedent of iPhone releases running up to three months late in Korea,~~ In this sentense,what is verb?? とはどういう意味ですか?
A: This is not a full sentence; it is a dependent clause. There is no verb. :)


Q: There is no precedent. と There is no precedents. はどう違いますか?
A: The first sentence is correct. The second sentence uses the plural form "precedents" but the verb does not agree. It should be "There are no precedents".

So the difference is simply a difference of singular/plural.
Q: precedent と antecedent はどう違いますか?
A: Precedent is a similar case to which you can compare to the current situation.

ex: "There is a legal precedent for your case; you won't do well in court"

Antecedent is a grammatical term referring to the noun that is being replaced by a pronoun.

ex: "That's Nancy's pen, give it back to her." "Nancy" is the Antecedent and "her" is the pronoun replacing it.

hope that helps.
Q: precedent と antecedent はどう違いますか?
A: antecedent = something that comes before another thing
"Economic strife is sometimes the antecedent of war."

precedent= an earlier event that is used as an example of how to achieve similar circumstances
"The president has set the precedent for how a president should act."


Q: Looking into the precedent if any, and then I proceed it. (is it correct?) は 英語 (アメリカ) で何と言いますか?
A: QAの全文をご確認ください
Q: precedent は 英語 (アメリカ) で何と言いますか?
Q: precedent は 英語 (アメリカ) で何と言いますか?
A: QAの全文をご確認ください


Q: There is no precedent for this kind of disaster. この表現は自然ですか?
A: I guess.
Or “This kind of disaster is unprecedented”
Q: precedent and presidentの発音を音声で教えてください。
A: This is how I would say President
Q: What does "make legal precedent at the expense of a sitting president" mean?

“I don’t think Mr. Mueller would ever try to make legal precedent at the expense of a sitting president in the context of an obstruction of justice charge,” Twardy said. He said the biggest concern for Trump in an interview is probably the risk of committing perjury, as Mueller will cross-check his comments and recollection against the testimony and evidence he’s obtained from Coats, Comey, Flynn, Sessions and others.
A: To do something with law that affects the president negatively.