Question
Updated on
5 Jun 2015
- Japanese
- Korean Near fluent
-
English (US)
-
English (UK)
-
Simplified Chinese (China)
Question about English (UK)
He said he didn't steal the camera, but the video footage from a surveillance camera showed otherwise. He turned out to be guilty. Does this sound natural?
He said he didn't steal the camera, but the video footage from a surveillance camera showed otherwise. He turned out to be guilty. Does this sound natural?
Related questions
-
What does he would have bought the car, but he had no money mean?
answerIt means that he didn't have money so he couln't buy the car, but if he had money he would have bought the car.
-
What is the difference between after being arrested , he was taken to the police station and afte...
answerThe first is correct. The second means the man concerned had a heart attack - a different meaning to "arrest", OR the man concerned arrested...
-
What is the difference between he admitted stealing the money and he admitted that he stole the m...
answerthe first sentence is grammatically incorrect: he admitted TO stealing the money ✔️ [to admit to = verb, stealing = noun] the second senten...
-
What is the difference between the police asked the thief to account for his whereabouts on the ...
answerCorrect = the police asked the thief to account for his whereabouts on the night of the crime. The rest are wrong/ incorrect.
-
What is the difference between The suspect admitted to stealing the money and The suspect admitte...
answerThe difference is that “the suspect admitted to stealing the money” is correct English and “the suspect admitted stealing the money” is wrong.
Similar questions
- Many had set up camera positions overnight, and the watchers included astronomers and other scien...
- He said he didn't steal the camera, but the video footage from a surveillance camera showed other...
- What does I'd rather not have my camera go through the X-rey. mean?
Previous question/ Next question